Quote
spacerspacer

 Rating Point of Reference

iTunes Tips
redline
 
With so much music on my iPod, it can be hard to work out what to base a rating on. You might love (5 stars) a song on one album and also love (5 stars) a song on another, but when you compare the two, you find you like the first more than the second. Without resorting to a rating scale of 100, 1000, etc., I've come to the conclusion that it's feasible to consider songs on the basis of albums only. I find it's much easier to take a single album as a point of reference instead of the entire library.

by japester on Dec 04 | 9:34 pm
redline


Comments

I use the star system in two ways :-)

The quick and dirty version:
(How many times a week would I be willing to listen to this song?) == (Number of Stars)

The more thoughtful version:
0 Stars = Not yet rated
1 Stars = This is crap, why is it taking up space?
2 Stars = This is crap, but at least it increases my song count!
3 Stars = This is just OK
4 Stars = I like this.
5 Stars = I really like this.


by Sys Admn on Jan 12 | 2:40 pm

Mine-

0 - Not rated or not worthy of rating (I should probably delete)
1 - I'm keeping this around for a reason
2 - Good, but not my favorite
3 - A great day to day play
4 - I could listen to this everyday
5 - I can't get enough of this song!


by dfbills on Jan 12 | 8:47 pm

I judge star ratings based on how I would react if the song came up on a random play list.

0: Unrated, purposefully or not (I leave my mostly orchestral/instrumental soundtracks unrated)

1: I don't like this song. If it comes up on a random playlist, I'll probably skip it.

2: There's a 50/50 chance i'll listen to the song, or just skip it.

3: Decent enough. "Average"

4: Very good, I might just listen to this again.

5: Amazing. I could listen to this half a dozen times in a row, and not get tired of it.

Of course, I'm a real packrat when it comes to music, I'll keep an entire album in my music library, just because I like one song on the album.


by Jonathan on Jan 18 | 9:24 pm

This is really close to mine.


by dfbills on Jan 19 | 12:17 am

Mine, with a bit of expansion on japester's initial comment - after struggling with this issue, I decided to use the artist in total as the basis for giving a song 5 or down to 1 star. With that in mind:

0 = not rated, i.e., not listened to
1 = I probably won't keep until I reconcile that I sold my cd's in my library and
I want a perm backup for it before it goes
2 = Adds to my library, is listenable, also a song that hit Billboard, so someone liked it. My 'completist' baseline.
3 = Good song that I like
4 = Really good. I bought albums for this song
5 = Top of the Pop Crop. Never tire of these.


by mdtoipod on Jan 22 | 3:51 am

1 Star - Bad song, I probably listened it once to get it a play count and forgot about it, short/bad voice interlude
2 Stars - long and good interludes, songs I would listen to everyone once in a while
3 stars - Average. Would listen to occasionally. Also the default rating if I feel ambivalent about a song
4 stars - Good song, I would listen to it a lot.
5 stars - cream of the crop. I constantly remove songs from 5 to 4 stars when I feel I was too hasty.


by Taco John on Feb 21 | 2:11 am

The way I set up my weighted random play guides my decisions on the star ratings. I have a 5-star random that is 150 5-star songs not played in last 7 days. My 4-star list is 125 songs not played in last 30 days. The 3-star list is 100 songs not played in last 60 days. 2-star is 75 not played in last 90, and 1-star is 50 not played in last 180.

Then my weighted random play (now possible because of iTunes 4.5) is the 500 songs (150+125+100+75+50) on the five playlists combined. So the frequency with which I want to hear a song determines its star rating.


by davepmiller on May 15 | 7:07 pm

I split playing my iPod about 50/50 - - half for me, half for other people (family, friends), and don't necessarily want to subject others to my eclectic musical taste. Here's my system:

0 - not yet rated / listened to
1 - needs attention (re-rating; Genre incorrect; Comment to add). Normally, I change a song to 1-star on the fly with the iPod.
2 - my own *personal* faves (things I like that I don't necessarily think family / friends will enjoy)
3 - average. I like it; most family friends probably would too.
4 - very good. I really like it; family / friends probably would too.
5 - excellent! I love it; family / friends better (or else). . . .


by Scott on Aug 10 | 9:55 am

My rating system seems complicated at first but it's actually very elegant.

Songs have 0 stars only if I haven't heard them or if I don't they aren't really "songs" enough to rate them (for instance 20 second long interstitial tracks on albums).

Everything I think is worth keeping gets at least 1 star, under the following guidelines.

There are twice as many 1 star songs as 2 star, twice as many 2 star as 3 star, and so on.

This means that I have approximately 16 one-star songs for every five-star song.

For example, I currently have about 1000 1 stars, 500 2 stars, 250 3 stars, 125 4 stars, and 60 5 stars.

I find this very useful, as it allows me to hone down on my absolute favorite songs ever (not just of this ephemeral moment).

Since the higher I go, the more selective I am, even 3 star songs tend to be very good.

Why keep a song if you'd never want to listen to it? Why rate every song you like 4 or 5 stars? Isn't there a difference between your favorite songs ever and the ones you like but don't love?


by tunnellb on Sep 14 | 11:01 pm

You must be logged in to post comments.

  USERS  
  Log-In  
  Register  

try this
red line
 
 


newest
red line
 
 
red line
popular
red line
 
 
red line
comments
red line
 
 
red line
questions
red line
 
 
red line
sites we like
red line
 
 

XML/RSS Feed

Powered by pMachine